<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does The Garmin 60 Csx Recieve Better Than The New Smaller Units?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.garmin-250.com/blog/2009/11/does-the-garmin-60-csx-recieve-better-than-the-new-smaller-units/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.garmin-250.com/blog/2009/11/does-the-garmin-60-csx-recieve-better-than-the-new-smaller-units/</link>
	<description>Question and Answers about Garmin GPS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:43:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Italian HItch</title>
		<link>http://www.garmin-250.com/blog/2009/11/does-the-garmin-60-csx-recieve-better-than-the-new-smaller-units/comment-page-1/#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>The Italian HItch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garmin-250.com/blog/2009/11/does-the-garmin-60-csx-recieve-better-than-the-new-smaller-units/#comment-787</guid>
		<description>huh???...im gonna ask my dad on this one....h/o
i have no i dea wat ur talking about and my dad has no i dea too...so make the question into english or something tht i could understand it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh???&#8230;im gonna ask my dad on this one&#8230;.h/o<br />
i have no i dea wat ur talking about and my dad has no i dea too&#8230;so make the question into english or something tht i could understand it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geog_ner</title>
		<link>http://www.garmin-250.com/blog/2009/11/does-the-garmin-60-csx-recieve-better-than-the-new-smaller-units/comment-page-1/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>geog_ner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garmin-250.com/blog/2009/11/does-the-garmin-60-csx-recieve-better-than-the-new-smaller-units/#comment-786</guid>
		<description>The GPSmap 60Cx/CSx uses a chipset made by SiRF.  Those receivers use a quad-helix antenna.  The quad-helix used to be superior with the older receivers, but with the current generation of SiRF, the antenna type doesn&#039;t really matter anymore.
The eTrex Vista HCx, Legend HCx, and Summit HCx use a chipset made by MediaTek.  This chipset seems to be as good, if not slightly better (more sensitive) than the SiRF-equipped 60Cx/CSx and 76Cx/CSx.  The eTrex series use a patch antenna.  Some people will try to tell you the patch antenna is inferior, but that is bunk when a good receiver and chipset are used.
I don&#039;t think you will go wrong with the new H-series eTrex models or the GPSmap Cx/CSx models.  The thing for you to decide is which is sized best for you, and which has the best button placement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GPSmap 60Cx/CSx uses a chipset made by SiRF.  Those receivers use a quad-helix antenna.  The quad-helix used to be superior with the older receivers, but with the current generation of SiRF, the antenna type doesn&#8217;t really matter anymore.<br />
The eTrex Vista HCx, Legend HCx, and Summit HCx use a chipset made by MediaTek.  This chipset seems to be as good, if not slightly better (more sensitive) than the SiRF-equipped 60Cx/CSx and 76Cx/CSx.  The eTrex series use a patch antenna.  Some people will try to tell you the patch antenna is inferior, but that is bunk when a good receiver and chipset are used.<br />
I don&#8217;t think you will go wrong with the new H-series eTrex models or the GPSmap Cx/CSx models.  The thing for you to decide is which is sized best for you, and which has the best button placement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: www.garmin-250.com @ 2012-02-09 05:23:30 -->
